Things You Don't Usually Hear About Minimalist RunningRecently the running world has been turned upside-down by
the notion that everything we have been doing the past 30 years with footwear
is wrong. If you run, you have certainly
heard about or read the book “Born to Run,” by Christopher McDougall which has
brought awareness to barefoot and minimalist running. Proponents of this style of running believe
that by switching to running barefoot a person will see a reduction in running
related injuries because there is a reduction in the amount of shock that a
person’s body experiences during the gait cycle and barefoot running will help
to strengthen muscles in the feet also resulting in a reduction of
injuries. However, runners who have made
the switch to this style of running sometimes still get injured and it seems in
some cases, these runners are perhaps experiencing more injuries. Several studies across the country are being
performed to understand running gait and injury prevention. At East Carolina University’s human movement
lab, several such studies have been performed and the results may surprise
you.
One aspect
of barefoot/minimalist running is that most runners will experience a gait
shift when running with no shoes or a minimalist shoe. The stride is shortened and the knees will be
bent a slightly more. A barefoot runner
will land more on the mid-foot and forefoot while a person with shoes tends to
land more on the heel. Landing more on
the mid-foot or forefoot with a shorter and more bent knee stride, works to
lessen the forces that the knee joint experiences. However, what would happen if a person runs
in shoes, but adjusts their gait so that the foot is more plantar-flexed (toe
first) than dorsi-flexed (heel first)?
ECU’s Dr. Blaise Williams, a physical therapist and biomechanist and
director of the Running Assessment Clinic at East Carolina also know as RACE,
has spent much time researching this question.
His research concluded that between running barefoot and changing to a
more mid-foot landing while wearing shoes there was no significant difference
in the forces in the knee joint. In
other words, a person could experience the same reduction in force at the knee
while wearing shoes that a barefoot runner does, and would further benefit from
the support that shoes offer for other areas of gait. Dr. Williams was careful to note that
changing the strike pattern is a drastic change and should be done with much
supervision. An easier solution with
similar results is to change strike frequency.
By striking more often, a person will shorten the stride and land more
mid-foot to forefoot. This can be done
with shoes or without. As
far as forces go, we have to assume that a person will adjust their gait to
land more plantar-flexed while running barefoot or in minimalist shoes in order
to experience the reduction in forces.
In a September 30, 2011 article that appeared in the New York Times, Tara Parker-Pope summarized research conducted at the
University of Wisconsin, La Crosse that tested how runners adapt to running
barefoot after years of running in shoes.
During the study, researchers discovered that roughly half of the
study’s participants never adjusted to the more forefoot gait and continued to
heel strike. This caused the forces that
the participants experienced to be far higher than the forces experienced while
wearing shoes, which will lead to more wear and tear on the body and possibly
more injuries. Another theoretical advantage to
running barefoot or with a minimalist shoe is that the intrinsic muscles (the
muscles within) of the foot are strengthened.
It is thought that running with traditional running shoes causes
weakness in the muscles of the foot because the support that the shoes offer reduces the
dependency on these muscles to provide support for the body.
Last spring
a small research study was performed to check the validity of this claim and to
see if additional research would be needed on the matter. Basically in order for muscle to be built,
the muscle must be activated.
Theoretically if researchers could measure the amount of muscle
activation then theoretically muscle strengthening could indirectly be
measured. Based on work by Doctor
Richard Segal at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, muscle
activation can be estimated by the amount of fluid in the muscle. This can be seen using an MRI machine. Muscle that is more active will have more
fluid and will therefore be a different color on an MRI image. Using software designed specially for the
purpose of comparing the color of segments of an MRI image, muscle activation
is estimated.
Armed with
this knowledge, Dr. Williams made a set of conditions where runners had muscle
activation measured in the abductor hallicus muscle (an intrinsic muscle of the
foot) in both barefoot and with shoes.
The experiment was conducted on two non-consecutive days with each
runner receiving a rested MRI and an MRI immediately after running on a
treadmill. On one day the runners ran
with shoes and the other day the runners ran barefoot. All participants used the same model shoe and
all ran a 9-minute pace on the same treadmill for 9 minutes. What Dr. Williams and his researchers found
was that there was not much of a change in muscle activation pre-workout vs.
post-workout. For all of the runners
there was about a 14% increase in muscle activation after running in shoes from
resting while there was only about a 7% increase over resting without
shoes. So actually while there was not a
significant difference in muscle activation, there was a slight increase when
running in shoes. While this research is
preliminary and certainly doesn’t allow us to draw any significant conclusions,
it certainly does make us question the idea that your feet will be stronger
from running barefoot and that you will be less injury prone running barefoot.
When the
minimalist idea started to become popular, there was very little research
present that would invalidate claims of injury prevention. Now as more and more people have tried it,
there is evidence that injuries still occur in runners who have adopted the
minimalist idea. Dr. Williams commented
that at his practice, he has seen a migration of injuries in runners. Where most of the injuries with traditional
running shoes occur at the knee joint, minimalist runners seem to experience
more injuries at the foot and ankle. It is not the purpose of this article to
discourage the use of minimalist shoes or running barefoot, but to rather point
out that those forms of running may not be for everyone. When it comes to running, everyone is differs
in size, shape, and biomechanics. It is impossible to give a one-size-fits all
solution in preventing running injuries. If you decide that running barefoot or
in a minimalist shoe is something you want to try, give yourself plenty of time
to adjust how you run. The more you
fatigue, the more likely you are to drift into landing heel first. Chose distances and speeds that you can
maintain form and keep a mid-foot to forefoot landing. In conclusion, if you are a runner and have
been injury free, think long and hard before adapting to an alternative running
style. Maybe what you have been doing
all along is exactly what you need to continue doing.
With questions regarding the barefoot/minimalist running
article please contact
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
|